<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>webNews &#187; Law</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/category/law/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com</link>
	<description>-archive_articles- I think are important for the purpose of research and debate</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 05:05:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Population Control</title>
		<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/population-control/</link>
		<comments>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/population-control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 21:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[china]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[family planning commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[npfpc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[un population fund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zhao]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is hard to put into words how perverse and disgusting it is to have a country with a law like Population Control. The fact that they are so “Matter of Fact” about it makes it even worse, taking a human life in the name of the government is said to be okay. China has a large population and lots of pollution, and they use this to justify their “one baby per family” rule.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/population-control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress Fights Transparency</title>
		<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/congress-fights-transparency/</link>
		<comments>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/congress-fights-transparency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 16:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[72 hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[72-hour rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[72hour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brian Baird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Walden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hour rule]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lawmakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative leaders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriot Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[posting bills online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican majority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rule 72]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/congress.jpg"><br /><br />What a joke! What are these guys scared of when posting bills online. Even this won’t help too much but why not allow the American people who are interested in seeing what their government is pushing on them by simply posting the bills online?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/congress-fights-transparency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tyranny of Health Insurance:</title>
		<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/the-tyranny-of-health-insurance/</link>
		<comments>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/the-tyranny-of-health-insurance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000 fine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[25]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barthold]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charged with a misdemeanor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fine or jail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john ensign]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joint committe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misdemeanor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national health service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sen. ensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thomas barthold]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img src="http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/obamaInsur.jpg"><br /><br />
It all started with a question. If you are going to impose on every American that they must buy Health Insurance, then what is the penalty if they choose not to?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/the-tyranny-of-health-insurance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taking Over American Education: the final chapter</title>
		<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/taking-over-american-education-the-final-chapter/</link>
		<comments>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/taking-over-american-education-the-final-chapter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 17:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bbb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cbo estimates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fitch ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government backed loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher education act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house of represenitives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[private lenders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sallie mae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[student loans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/?p=218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WASHINGTON -- House approval of an education-financing bill Thursday marks a first step toward sweeping changes in U.S. higher education that would cut out private lenders and leave the government as sole provider of student loans under federal programs.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/taking-over-american-education-the-final-chapter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maxine Waters: Press Should Probe Conservatives For Racist Views</title>
		<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/maxine-waters-press-should-probe-conservatives-for-racist-views/</link>
		<comments>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/maxine-waters-press-should-probe-conservatives-for-racist-views/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 16:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maxine waters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protesters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/?p=152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hill: Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) said that it's not enough for African-Americans to levy allegations of racism against the right-leaning protesters, and that the media must look into their views.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/maxine-waters-press-should-probe-conservatives-for-racist-views/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>45% Of Doctors Would Consider Quitting</title>
		<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/45-of-doctors-would-consider-quitting/</link>
		<comments>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/45-of-doctors-would-consider-quitting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctors quit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/?p=154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By TERRY JONES
News Analysis by IBD &#124; Posted Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:30 PM PT
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=337909690110379
Two of every three practicing physicians oppose the medical overhaul plan under consideration in Washington, and hundreds of thousands would think about shutting down their practices or retiring early if it were adopted, a new IBD/TIPP Poll has found.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/45-of-doctors-would-consider-quitting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smoking Papers On Global Warming</title>
		<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/smoking-papers-on-global-warming/</link>
		<comments>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/smoking-papers-on-global-warming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[house]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nancy pelosi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waxman-markey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/?p=145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY &#124; Posted Wednesday, September 16, 2009 4:20 PM PT<br />
http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=337991812954735 <br /><br />
Climate Change: A Treasury Department analysis says a cap-and-trade law could cost American families more than $1,700 a year. No wonder administrators tried to keep the study secret.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/smoking-papers-on-global-warming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CO2 emissions take center stage over MPG</title>
		<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/co2-emissions-take-center-stage-over-mpg/</link>
		<comments>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/co2-emissions-take-center-stage-over-mpg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cafe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dave mccurdy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DaveMccurdy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[false]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grams per mile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GramsPerMile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mpg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nhtsa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nhtsa cafe rules]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NhtsaCafeRules]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[by Sebastian Blanco (RSS feed) on Sep 15th 2009 at 3:22PM<br />
<br />
Back in May, the Obama Administration raised the national CAFE standard to 35.5 mpg (for cars and trucks) by 2016. The higher standard would build from the 27.3 mpg 2011 standard and go up five percent each year until 2016. Today, the Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Transportation issued a joint statement proposing just how the two agencies will work together to reach the higher standard required for model year 2012-2016 vehicles. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/co2-emissions-take-center-stage-over-mpg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum may challenge &#8216;injurious&#8217; Obama</title>
		<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/santorum-may-challenge-injurious-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/santorum-may-challenge-injurious-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Presidential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arlen Specter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[president 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[September 15, 2009<br />
By Ben Smith 12:59 PM<br />
<br />
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0909/Santorum_may_challenge_injurious_Obama.html<br />
<br />
Rick Santorum affirmed on an RNC conference call -- aimed at attacking Arlen Specter -- that he's considering a run for president in 2012 -- because, he said, the Obama presidency is "injurious to America."
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/santorum-may-challenge-injurious-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, Mr. President</title>
		<link>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/no-mr-president/</link>
		<comments>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/no-mr-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60 minutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legislative act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national health service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 13, 2009<br />
<br />
Posted by William Kristo<br />
<br />
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Weblogs/TWSFP/TWSFPView.asp#13172<br />
<br />
In his 60 Minutes interview to be aired tonight, President Obama apparently says, "I intend to be president for a while and once this bill passes, I own it....I'm the one who's going to be held responsible. So I have every incentive to get this right."

]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://webnews.ampnetmedia.com/no-mr-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
