12
Dec/09
0

Population Control

Save the Planet Kill Yourself

Save the Planet Kill Yourself

It is hard to put into words how perverse and disgusting it is to have a country with a law like Population Control. The fact that they are so “Matter of Fact” about it makes it even worse, taking a human life in the name of the government is said to be okay. China has a large population and lots of pollution, and they use this to justify their “one baby per family” rule.

Laws like this devalue the tremendous value that life caries. It is so hard for us to understand because we value life of others more than our own in many cases. Or do we? There is a growing number of Western Nations that would be subdued to the devaluation of life, in the name of government. Look at health care, we and other countries are already putting a value on life in the name of cost cutting. And we are getting articles from journalist like this one from the China Daily that are agreeing and promoting with China’s laws in the name of Global Warming and Global Population Control. It’s sickening to me.

[source: ChinaDaily]

12
Dec/09
0

Pay Czar Cuts – Fed gets raise

Congressional Hall

Congressional Hall

It has always amazed me at how well the government takes care of its own. I’m not talking about the people that elect them, I’m talking about the unelected bureaucrats in so many powerful positions amongst the government. It gets even worse when we are in a recession cutting back on our standard of living and grasping trying to hold on to what we have, while they are increasing in numbers and pay.

The Obama administration made claims about cutting federal spending and cutting back in the government, well this would have been one of their chances. Instead they allow these bureaucrats to receive big salary raises – on top of great healthcare and pension benefits – while the “Pay Czar” is cutting salary to private citizens. Something is backwards here.

[source: USA Today]

22
Sep/09
0

Obama For Action Despite Facts:

Obama

Obama

Only a week after top scientist make a u-turn on global warming, our president faces major nations of the world to announce what America is doing to combat “man-made climate change”


By JOSH GERSTEIN | 9/22/09 10:28 AM EDT
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27430.html#ixzz0RtI5FCcr

President Barack Obama’s closely watched climate change speech at the United Nations got a mixed reaction Tuesday: Some world leaders saluted his rhetoric, but environmental activists expressed disappointment that he didn’t commit to a timeline to pass cap-and-trade legislation in the Senate.

“After too many years of inaction and denial, there is finally widespread recognition of the urgency of the challenge before us. We know what needs to be done,” Obama told fellow heads of state gathered for a climate change summit called by U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

“The House of Representatives passed an energy and climate bill in June that would finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy for American businesses and dramatically reduce greenhouse gas emissions,” Obama said. “One committee has already acted on this bill in the Senate, and I look forward to engaging with others as we move forward.”

Many diplomats and environmentalists were hoping that Obama would detail his strategy to move House-approved carbon-emissions-trading legislation through the Senate and onto his desk to be signed into law ahead of a key climate change conference this December in Copenhagen. But the president made only a vague pledge to continue pushing for the measure.

“The Obama speech was a missed opportunity,” said Annie Petsonk, international counsel for Environmental Defense Fund. “Leaders want him to lay out a game plan to get a bill through the Senate, to give some timeline, some commitment to do it on a timely basis. … They didn’t get it.”

Environmental activists are particularly concerned that U.S. influence and leadership in the climate issue are dwindling ahead of Copenhagen, with the issue of global warming getting pushed further and further down the presidential agenda by other pressing concerns, such as health care reform, the recession and Afghanistan.

Former Vice President Al Gore gave a warm, but not effusive, reception to Obama’s remarks.

“I thought that he was simply recognizing the reality of the situation that this legislation is still pending,” Gore said at a U.N. press briefing. “I welcome his promise to get personally engaged in the work of the Senate committees.”

Gore said it would be “far better” for the climate change treaty talks set for Copenhagen in December if the U.S. Senate acted by then.

“I would encourage the Senate to take up the climate and energy legislation immediately upon conclusion of the pending health care debate, if not before,” Gore said. “I interpret President Obama’s statement about getting involved in that process to mean that he will urge them to do exactly that.”

Asked about the decision not to set a timeline, White House climate czar Carol Browner said the Senate’s pace was not under Obama’s control. “The Senate is hard at work,” Browner said. “Health care has obviously taken up more time than was originally anticipated. … At the end of the day, [Senate Majority Leader] Harry Reid does set the schedule for the Senate, and we have to be mindful of that.”

Obama said little about the resistance in the Senate but indicated the recent economic slump has left some lawmakers reluctant to impose emissions changes that could affect a weakened economy.

“We seek sweeping but necessary change in the midst of a global recession, where every nation’s most immediate priority is reviving their economy and putting their people back to work. And so all of us will face doubts and difficulties in our own capitals as we try to reach a lasting solution to the climate challenge,” Obama said. “But I’m here today to say that difficulty is no excuse for complacency. Unease is no excuse for inaction.”

The president insisted his administration has taken a series of important, groundbreaking actions to fight global warming, such as increasing fuel economy standards and directing stimulus funds and tax credits to energy efficiency.

“These steps represent an historic recognition on behalf of the American people and their government,” he said. “We understand the gravity of the climate threat. We are determined to act. We will meet our responsibility to future generations.”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/27430.html#ixzz0RtICWibT

25
Feb/09
0

Great news: Obama names Biden stimulus czar

Joe Biden

Joe Biden

posted at 1:20 pm on February 23, 2009 by Allahpundit

[source: http://hotair.com/archives/2009/02/23/great-news-obama-names-biden-as-stimulus-czar/ ]


Skip ahead to 4:05. Just what a jittery America needs to restore confidence in the feds’ bailout management. Worried that Greasy Joe suddenly has an $800 billion line of credit and zero executive experience? Don’t be. The Obama business brain trust is right there behind him, willing and able to lend a hand.

If you want to congratulate The One on his master stroke, the Recovery.gov website is now accepting reader feedback. Exit question: Which is most reassuring — Biden heading up the stimulus, Panetta learning intel on the fly as head of the CIA, or our new energy secretary needing to be told that he’s responsible for, um, energy?

21
Aug/08
0

Chavez’s Big Grab

hugo chavez

hugo chavez

Is this why people love this guy? I just don’t get the love affair that people of free nations have with socialism. Chavez has already seized control over American companies when we built up their oil infrastructure and their telecommunications for their country. Now they are doing the same, not just to our European allies, but our friends to the south as well. How can we put up with someone like this? We should take action against him, with a coalition of the countries that Chavez has disgraced. Not necessarily military action but the first steps toward it. We could blockade his shipping ports, stop trades, and help the people in Venezuela that protest this dictator. We are too wrapped up in not wanting to look bad to the rest of the world, and most of the rest of the world is sympathetic to growing socialist countries like Venezuela. Even with that, we must not let him continue to use his military to force private companies, from other countries that put their time and money into Venezuela, out of the country.

Chavez’s Big Grab

By INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:20 PM PT

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=304125139898165

Socialism: Venezuela’s seizure of Cemex assets Monday is more than a typical nationalization of resources. Its vindictive manner has much to do with the firm’s Mexican headquarters. It’s a message to others in the region.

Like a quasi-military conquest, Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez marched in troops to “take back” four Cemex cement plants in the dead of night as part of his nationalization of cement announced in April. “It was time,” he said Tuesday, calling it one of his “steps toward socialism.”

Chavez then popped out fireworks as red T-shirted mobs, judges and politicians headed to the plants and cheered their “victory.”

Why was Cemex “defeated”? Because last April, Mexico’s Cemex told Chavez its plants were worth $1.3 billion, based on standard norms of value. Chavistas said no dice, and after driving their stock price down in Caracas trade, offered $800 million tops.

The Venezuelans, of course, had the last word, and moved into their clownish conquest even before Chavez’s 90-day negotiation period expired.

For Latin Americans, this is something of a wake-up call. No longer will Latin American companies be exempt from Chavez’s power plays. In fact, a Latin American company might now expect even worse treatment than the western ones Chavez has grabbed.

Mexican President Felipe Calderon, no stranger to public quarrels with Chavez over free markets, complained that Chavez’s takeover amounted to discrimination against the Mexican company. He noted that Venezuela had paid two other cement firms — Holcie of Switzerland and Lafarge of France — fair prices for their assets. So the Mexican company was ripped off, which “we cannot understand,” Calderon said, calling for more talks.

The sooner Mexico recognizes the obvious, the better.

Chavez’s vindictive treatment of a Mexican company has more to do with his loathing of Mexico, and the capitalist development path it has pursued, than it does with price. Successful Latin American companies ought to expect particularly harsh treatment from Chavez if they succeed. There already are many signs of this.

For one, the last time Chavez made a show of troops and flags was when he seized Exxon Mobil’s assets in 2007. Like Exxon, Cemex is a foreign company, and the amounts expropriated — about $1 billion in Exxon’s case and $1.3 billion in Cemex’s — are comparable.

Second, like Exxon, Cemex is a big company that has resisted being kicked around by a petty dictator. Cemex reportedly has told Chavez that it would see him in international court.

As global companies, both Exxon and Cemex know their responses to Chavez are being watched closely by other dictators. They must defend their shareholders, an alien notion to Chavez.

Still, it goes even beyond that. Mexico’s Cemex, like U.S.-based Exxon, is known for its advanced technology, state of the art operations, fiscal transparency and high profitability. For any company this is remarkable. But for a Mexican company it is especially so.

Chavez not only cannot stand Mexico, he also cannot stand the idea of a successful, world-class Latin American company like Cemex providing an example to the region. Rather than leave them alone, he’s not only trying to rub their presence out with nationalization, he’s also tricked up bogus charges of tax evasion and environmental damage — something no nationalized firm has avoided.

Chavez has nationalized telecommunications, electricity, farms, iron, steel, oil and banks over two years in a bid to end private property and turn Venezuela into Cuba. All of the nationalized firms have since gone from profitability to losses.

The prosperity and better life Cemex’s jobs represent for its 67,000 workers as well as the superior product it delivers to its customers directly challenges Chavez’s claim to ideological dominance in the region.

As we said, Cemex likely will defend itself in court. But Mexico’s government will have to toughen up and prepare to confront a predator challenging the success of its private sector on more than just this front. Chavez’s wrath against Mexico is particularly strong.